ST Phoenix v3.5

A SuperTrend grid Expert Advisor for MetaTrader 4, trading EURUSD on Mean Renko bricks, rebuilt and tested over three years of data.

140+automated backtests
3 years2024, 2025, 2026 tested
3 / 3profitable years, MID setup
PF > 2every year, even at a 1-pip spread

How the strategy works

ST Phoenix trades SuperTrend direction changes on a Mean Renko chart. Each brick is a fixed amount of price movement, so quiet markets produce no noise and busy sessions produce plenty of signals.

SuperTrend entries

A trade opens when a fast SuperTrend flips direction on a closed brick.

Colour exit

A side in profit is banked as soon as a brick of the opposite colour closes. This is where most profit comes from.

Martingale grid

If price runs against a position, the EA adds larger trades at widening intervals to pull the average price back.

Turbo Snowball

When one side is up by a small target, it pays off the other side's worst loser. In v3.5 it can pay off part of a loser, shrinking the grid step by step.

Vault floor

Part of each gain is locked in as an equity floor. If equity touches it, everything closes and the gain is protected.

Phoenix lives

After a floor hit the EA restarts from the new balance, a limited number of times. Its state survives terminal restarts and server reboots.

Compounding

The first lot grows with equity, so profits are reinvested automatically.

The backtest station

To test properly, we built an unattended testing rig next to the live MT4 terminal, so hundreds of runs could happen without touching the trading account.

Hidden tester

A cloned MT4 runs on an invisible display in its own Wine prefix with trading disabled, driven by scripts that set up, start and save each test.

10 years of data

EURUSD one-minute history from 2016 onwards, downloaded through MT4's History Center and checked against broker prices.

Renko on demand

A script rebuilds the Mean Renko chart offline at any brick size and hands it to the Strategy Tester. No manual chart juggling.

Every tick model

All tests start from $1,000 and run a single calendar year (2026 runs to 30 October). Results and equity curves are saved automatically.

Step 1: brick size and SuperTrend

The first sweep tested 27 combinations on 2026: three brick sizes × three SuperTrend speeds × three band widths. The goal was a plateau, a region where neighbouring settings all make money, rather than one lucky best setting.

Net profit by brick size, SuperTrend period and multiplier
2026 (Jan–Oct), $1,000 start, v3.4. Brighter blue = more profit.
Every setting either made $2–6k or wiped the account. There was no middle ground, which is the signature of a martingale grid: the indicator settings mostly decide when a bad grid arrives. Large bricks were a minefield, and medium bricks gave a solid block of profitable settings at about 3 trades a day.

Out-of-sample check

The three best medium-brick settings were then run on 2025, a year they were never tuned on.

SuperTrend2026 (tuned)2025 (unseen)Verdict
Setting A (fastest)+$5,592wipedToo twitchy
Setting B+$5,607+$5,531 (DD 54%)Survived, barely
Setting C+$5,070+$9,837 (DD 18%)Chosen

Step 2: finding a dead feature

Cutting the snowball target by 97% changed nothing, to the cent. A debug build logged every snowball check for a full year to find out why.

831,582times a side passed the target
16,188with losers on the other side
0times it could pay the worst loser in full
72%best coverage ever reached
The snowball was all-or-nothing. It had to pay off the biggest grid loser in one go, which it never could. v3.5 adds a partial close: the winner pays off as many lots of the loser as it can afford. It fired about 180 times in testing and trimmed drawdowns slightly.

Lives and the vault

The best 2025 run peaked at $13.2k, then stopped trading in June: it had used all of its lives. With more lives allowed, the same setup traded the whole year and finished at +$28,033, using about eight floor hits. Each floor hit locks in gains and restarts from a higher balance.

Step 3: tuning the grid

The grid multiplier and spacing control how fast the grid stacks up against a trend. We pushed both in each direction until something broke.

Grid multiplier: profit and worst drawdown
$1,000 start, all other settings fixed. The two gentlest were tested on 2024 only.
Multiplier202420252026Verdict
Gentlest+$7,067 · DD 57%––Grid too weak to recover
Gentle+$7,497 · DD 62%––Grid too weak to recover
Chosen+$7,139 · DD 18%+$30,172 · DD 21%+$6,075 · DD 43%Sweet spot
Steep+$6,638 · DD 25%+$30,622 · DD 26%+$6,482 · DD 48%Same money, more risk
Steepest+$8,416 · DD 22%wiped in week 1+$6,635 · DD 54%Breaks
Too gentle and the grid can't pull the average back; too steep and one early bad run kills the account. Spacing mattered too: medium spacing beat wide spacing on profit every year, while the tightest spacing made the most money but nearly emptied the account in 2026.

Step 4: three risk tiers, stress-tested

The finalists were grouped by risk and re-run with a much wider spread, about five times the normal test spread, to mimic real spread and slippage.

LOW risk MID risk HIGH risk
Net profit per year
$1,000 start, compounding on. Choose the spread:
Maximum drawdown per year
Deepest fall from a peak, including open trades. Lower is smoother.
Show the numbers as a table
MID is the toughest setup. It lost only 5–15% of its profit to the wider spread and stayed above PF 2 every year. HIGH breaks: the extra spread on its fast grid turned 2024 into a loss with an 86% drawdown, even though 2025 still made $45k. LOW is smooth but small.

Equity curves

The Strategy Tester's own balance graphs for each tier and year, at the 1-pip stress spread.

Curve showcase

Fifteen standout runs, grouped by risk. Each one started from $1,000 with compounding on. Runs marked stress were tested at the 1-pip spread.

What the tests can't tell you

  1. Renko bricks in the tester are rebuilt from one-minute data, so they may be slightly smoother than live bricks.
  2. Real execution adds variable spread, slippage and swaps beyond the 1-pip stress test.
  3. A martingale grid can lose the whole account in a single long trend. The vault floor limits this, but it doesn't remove it.

Next step: a live forward test of the MID setup on a small account.